What is the difference between invalid deductive argument and inductive argument

These are distinguished by their aim:With deductive arguments, our conclusions are already contained, even if implicitly, in our premises.Inductive reasoning is used to show the likelihood that an argument will prove true in the future.To me, this sounds a bit more like the scientific method.In a deductive argument, the inference or the conclusion is certain.

It cannot increase or decrease the validity of a deductive argument).Weak arguments are always uncogent.An inductive argument is the use of collected instances of evidence of something specific to support a general conclusion.Inductive reasoning is an activity that is necessary for solving problems in everyday life or carrying out debates, while deductive reasoning is crucial in scientific demonstrations and discoveries.There is no degree of validity (deductive arguments) because a deductive argument is either valid or invalid.

You have a theory, test that theory, and then confirm it with conclusive/valid results.And the arguments are sound when the conclusion, following those valid arguments, is true.Suppose that instead of saying that most birds fly, premise 2 said that all birds fly.